In Flanders Field

MEMORIAL DAY (Monday, May 27, 2013) was originally called Decoration Day, after the practice of decorating the graves of fallen soldiers.

Remember this most popular poem to mark the day? For a refresher on its origin, visit the website of the Arlington National Cemetery, “where valor proudly sleeps.”

In Flanders Fields

by Lieutenant Colonel John McCrae, MD, Canadian Army  (1872-1918)

In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place: and in the sky
The larks still bravely singing fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.

We are the dead: Short days ago,
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved and were loved: and now we lie
In Flanders fields!

Take up our quarrel with the foe
To you, from failing hands, we throw
The torch: be yours to hold it high
If ye break faith with us who die,
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders fields


Going the distance

A question posed to a panel recently: what are writers willing to do for their craft?

Mystery writers will go a long way for verisimilitude. Members of organizations like Sisters in Crime and Mystery Writers of America periodically take up arms at a gun range, for example, to experience what so many protagonists and villains do. Writers go on ride-alongs with local police and sometimes take on the jobs of their protagonists. Speakers at meetings include cops, FBI agents, and even a retired CIA agent (only partially forthcoming, of course).

How important is this? Of course we need to get our “facts” straight, and experiencing the weight and feel of a gun and hearing from “real” crime fighters can be useful as we write.

So, should we walk down a dark alley in the worst part of town late at night, hoping we’ll have the experience of a mugging or a gunshot wound? Maybe not. We write fiction, after all.

Sneaking in a little tribute:

Marie Curie, who discovered radioactivity (loosely speaking; details on request), went the distance for her passion. She died of leukemia at 67. She left many notebooks and diaries for posterity — they’re all still radioactive and whoever wants to read them has to be carefully monitored. Biographers have to sign a medical release before being granted access.

How far do you think writers should go for their stories? How far are you willing to go for your passion?

Howahya?

I claimed Boston as my home for more than half my (long) life. I was born in a suburb less than 8 miles away from downtown, went to college on the Fenway – yes THE Fenway. In certain classrooms on campus you could hear the crack of the bat. I also taught at that same college for more than a dozen years. Is that enough Boston for you?

Besides hosting more than 53 institutions of higher learning, including MIT, Harvard, and Henley {oops, sorry, that’s my fictional school in the Professor Sophie Knowles series ;) }, Boston has its own accent. Travel even 20 miles from Boston, and the accent is gone, indistinguishable from that of the network anchor in Grinnell, Iowa.

Everyone recognizes the accent; not everyone can imitate it. Even after decades in accent-free California, I can go back to it whenever I choose. Or, whenever I talk to my relatives and friends who still live there, says my husband, The Cable Guy.

“Hi, they-ah,” I say. “Howahya?”

Even though I now sound like the rest of the country, careful with my r’s, I’m very protective of Boston-speak.

Ben Affleck in "The Town"

One of my biggest pet peeves is when actors/actresses who are not natives try to take it on. It doesn’t work. Nothing can spoil a movie for me like a pretend Boston accent which makes the actor sound like he’s rolling a hot potato around in his mouth. An old but good example is Rob Morrow in “Quiz Show.” In an attempt to sound out the broad a’s, his lips never meet. Similarly, in “The Verdict,” set in Boston, no one got it right. Thank you, Paul Newman, for not trying. In newer movies, actors and their directors know enough not to try. They leave it to natives like Matt Damon and Ben Affleck. Check out this video of Boston accents in movies. There are some decent ones (Baldwin, Williams) and some bad ones (Hanks). CAUTION: One or two words are adult-only, and might be offensive.

JFK is often maligned for his accent. People laugh at his “Cuba(r) and Laos.” But Kennedy, and every other Bostonian, would pronounce Cuba as Cuba, unless the word is followed by another word that begins with a vowel. Thus:

“I went to Cuba,” but “I went to Cuba(r) and Laos.”

Similarly, a Bostonian would say “I obey the law,” but “I’m studying the law(r) of gravity.”

This is a common practice in many languages, where the letter used for the elision is actually written, as in Italian with e and ed, the words for and, depending on the first letter of the next word.

An article in an otherwise reputable newspaper once compared GWB’s mispronounciation of “nuclear” to JFK’s “Cuba (r) and Laos.” BLEEP! There is a linguistic logic to the latter; the former is simply incorrect.

Back in the days of landlines, I called the San Jose Airport, seeking information (pre-Internet) about the layout of the airport before I drove there for a flight.

“Can you tell me where to park my car?” I asked.  ["Pahk my cah."]

“I’m sorry,” the clerk said. “We have no flights to Pakaka.”

At that moment I decided to learn to speak like a TV anchorwoman. Now, I do. Well, most of the time.

The Leontyne Price Effect

The group in the photo seem to be enjoying a lovely landscape through the template of a television set. No guts, no screen, just the unmistakable outline of a TV.

What do these people have in common with the great American soprano, Leontyne Price?

Rewinding a few decades: besides Perry Como and the Andrews Sisters, the principal singers of my youth were the stars of the Metropolitan Opera. In our Italian-American community, the “show tunes” we hummed, the tunes played by the marching bands at the Columbus Day parade, were the arias of the great operas. Ritorna Vincitor,  Quando M’en Vo’, Vesti La Giubba, the triumphal march from Aida.

I remember ironing my father’s work pants and my sister’s school dresses (and pillowcases, too, believe it or not!) to the sounds of the Met broadcasts on Saturday morning radio.

Much later, I heard an interview with Ms. Price during which she said (I paraphrase) that with all her successes, the moment she knew she’d made it was when she heard herself on one of those radio broadcasts.

No one asked her why she felt that way. So I’ve felt free to speculate. Was it because technology made it possible for her to be heard by so many more opera fans that could fit into the Met, old or new? Because the particular technology of radio was au courant, thus adding a measure of status, a touch of reality beyond her mere physical presence on that great stage?

Maybe the group in the photo are after that same experience, making the peaceful landscape more real by framing it in a television set. It works for me.

FB made me do it

What do you think of the scene above? Typical, right? What ever happened to paying attention to people you’re with, focusing on one thing at a time? Cell phones should be banned from the dinner table. Right? Then we can get back to real conversation.

Maybe not.

Sometimes we forget that people were inattentive and impolite before cell phones. And workaholics also predate mobile devices, as do people who want you to think they’re important by shouting orders into a phone as they walk or ride a bus. “I want to see twelve copies on my desk when I get there,” one guy screamed from the seat next to me on BART recently. Mobile devices are simply the latest tool for selfish or pompous behavior.

Using a cell phone does take some skills I admire, however. Like one-handed texting:  maintaining an attentive look while dropping one hand below table height, touch-texting. This takes more skill than the one who drops both hands on her lap and texts her friend to tell what’s on the menu or how good the fries are.

A 10-year-old visited us lately. She left the dinner table early and sat on a nearby recliner with her phone, competing with herself (or someone in Korea?) in an e-game. The conversation going on at the table caught her interest at one point and she joined in from a distance. Bad hostess that I am, I told her she couldn’t contribute unless she came back to the table, without her phone.

She thought a minute, checked her phone. “I’m winning,” she said, and stayed away.

Here’s another true story.

When one of my stepdaughters was away at college, she’d send us postcards. “Hi! I’m in the library studying,” she’d write.

“No, you’re not,” her father and I would respond (to each other), “You’re in the library writing postcards to all your family and friends.”

That was more than 20 years ago. That same “girl” is now on Facebook, posting up-to-the-minute reports on what she’s doing. “Hubby and I are enjoying a date night,” she posts.

“No, you’re not,” her father and I say. “You’re on Facebook.”

I’m not passing judgment here. I have my own undisciplined temperament to deal with!

The point is simply that Facebook and mobile phones haven’t changed who we are; they’re simply our current tools. I try to use them the way I use any tool—to serve my needs, under my control. Not that it always works that way, but it’s my choice, and I can never blame new technology for time wasted.

Remembering

For all of my life in the Boston area, April 19 was a holiday — no school, and, of course the Boston Marathon, the world’s oldest annual marathon. Now Patriot’s Day will always have a tragic aspect to remember, the hijacking of its meaning by bombers.

Here’s the response to the explosions, from MIT students on Monday:


And here’s the text of Longfellow’s poem:

Listen my children and you shall hear
Of the midnight ride of Paul Revere,
On the eighteenth of April, in Seventy-five;
Hardly a man is now alive
Who remembers that famous day and year.

He said to his friend, “If the British march
By land or sea from the town to-night,
Hang a lantern aloft in the belfry arch
Of the North Church tower as a signal light,–
One if by land, and two if by sea;
And I on the opposite shore will be,
Ready to ride and spread the alarm
Through every Middlesex village and farm,
For the country folk to be up and to arm.”

Then he said “Good-night!” and with muffled oar
Silently rowed to the Charlestown shore,
Just as the moon rose over the bay,
Where swinging wide at her moorings lay
The Somerset, British man-of-war;
A phantom ship, with each mast and spar
Across the moon like a prison bar,
And a huge black hulk, that was magnified
By its own reflection in the tide.

Meanwhile, his friend through alley and street
Wanders and watches, with eager ears,
Till in the silence around him he hears
The muster of men at the barrack door,
The sound of arms, and the tramp of feet,
And the measured tread of the grenadiers,
Marching down to their boats on the shore.

Then he climbed the tower of the Old North Church,
By the wooden stairs, with stealthy tread,
To the belfry chamber overhead,
And startled the pigeons from their perch
On the sombre rafters, that round him made
Masses and moving shapes of shade,–
By the trembling ladder, steep and tall,
To the highest window in the wall,
Where he paused to listen and look down
A moment on the roofs of the town
And the moonlight flowing over all.

Beneath, in the churchyard, lay the dead,
In their night encampment on the hill,
Wrapped in silence so deep and still
That he could hear, like a sentinel’s tread,
The watchful night-wind, as it went
Creeping along from tent to tent,
And seeming to whisper, “All is well!”
A moment only he feels the spell
Of the place and the hour, and the secret dread
Of the lonely belfry and the dead;
For suddenly all his thoughts are bent
On a shadowy something far away,
Where the river widens to meet the bay,–
A line of black that bends and floats
On the rising tide like a bridge of boats.

Meanwhile, impatient to mount and ride,
Booted and spurred, with a heavy stride
On the opposite shore walked Paul Revere.
Now he patted his horse’s side,
Now he gazed at the landscape far and near,
Then, impetuous, stamped the earth,
And turned and tightened his saddle girth;
But mostly he watched with eager search
The belfry tower of the Old North Church,
As it rose above the graves on the hill,
Lonely and spectral and sombre and still.
And lo! as he looks, on the belfry’s height
A glimmer, and then a gleam of light!
He springs to the saddle, the bridle he turns,
But lingers and gazes, till full on his sight
A second lamp in the belfry burns.

A hurry of hoofs in a village street,
A shape in the moonlight, a bulk in the dark,
And beneath, from the pebbles, in passing, a spark
Struck out by a steed flying fearless and fleet;
That was all! And yet, through the gloom and the light,
The fate of a nation was riding that night;
And the spark struck out by that steed, in his flight,
Kindled the land into flame with its heat.
He has left the village and mounted the steep,
And beneath him, tranquil and broad and deep,
Is the Mystic, meeting the ocean tides;
And under the alders that skirt its edge,
Now soft on the sand, now loud on the ledge,
Is heard the tramp of his steed as he rides.

It was twelve by the village clock
When he crossed the bridge into Medford town.
He heard the crowing of the cock,
And the barking of the farmer’s dog,
And felt the damp of the river fog,
That rises after the sun goes down.

It was one by the village clock,
When he galloped into Lexington.
He saw the gilded weathercock
Swim in the moonlight as he passed,
And the meeting-house windows, black and bare,
Gaze at him with a spectral glare,
As if they already stood aghast
At the bloody work they would look upon.

It was two by the village clock,
When he came to the bridge in Concord town.
He heard the bleating of the flock,
And the twitter of birds among the trees,
And felt the breath of the morning breeze
Blowing over the meadow brown.
And one was safe and asleep in his bed
Who at the bridge would be first to fall,
Who that day would be lying dead,
Pierced by a British musket ball.

You know the rest. In the books you have read
How the British Regulars fired and fled,—
How the farmers gave them ball for ball,
From behind each fence and farmyard wall,
Chasing the redcoats down the lane,
Then crossing the fields to emerge again
Under the trees at the turn of the road,
And only pausing to fire and load.

So through the night rode Paul Revere;
And so through the night went his cry of alarm
To every Middlesex village and farm,—
A cry of defiance, and not of fear,
A voice in the darkness, a knock at the door,
And a word that shall echo for evermore!
For, borne on the night-wind of the Past,
Through all our history, to the last,
In the hour of darkness and peril and need,
The people will waken and listen to hear
The hurrying hoof-beats of that steed,
And the midnight message of Paul Revere.

THE FOLLOWING and other darkness

Anyone watching THE FOLLOWING?

There’s so much to recommend it:

• a serial killer with a charming British accent

• sick, sick people who get off on killing

• a cult, binding together all the sick people

• as much pettiness in the cult as you’d find in your average soap opera

• an annoying little boy

• ridiculously shallow allusions to the works of Edgar Allan Poe

• an FBI agent with great angst and a secret in his past

• a cliché affair between the ex-wife of the serial killer and the FBI agent hunting him

So why do I have a season pass for the show and watch in real time on Monday eve if at all possible?

I could blame Kevin Bacon, who always shows up, 100% for a part.

Several times I’ve sat down to write a serial killer novel, or a dark thriller, or psychological suspense. The kind of book I read, the kind of TV show and movies I watch. But when it comes to writing in that genre, my fingers pull away from the keyboard and I take a chocolate break. When I get back, I drag out a synopsis for a cozy mystery and type away.

Why such a disparity between what I read and what I write?

My current theory is this—when I’m writing a novel, I’m in The Zone. The character is with me 24/7, Sundays and holidays. Whether I’m writing the Periodic Table Mysteries, as Camille Minichino, the Miniature Mysteries as Margaret Grace, or the Professor Sophie Knowles Mysteries, as Ada Madison, there’s little else in my head besides the protagonist and her posse.

It’s just too scary to hang out and even sleep with a really, really, sick guy.

So until I learn to separate my writing from my life, more cozies are on the way.

I vermiculate; you vermiculate . . .

Last week I vermiculated a birthday card for my friend.

Word of the day: vermiculate (v., to ornament with wavy lines resembling the form or tracks of worm.)

On second thought, the word is abstruse enough that it could be called the word of the month. I came across it in a word puzzle, which is one of the main sources of new words for me.

In grade school our homework always included lists of words to be conquered. We learned to spell them, pronounce them, and use them in a sentence. I wonder how many of the words in my current vocabulary are survivors since third grade.

Always curious about numbers, I wondered about the size of the vocabulary of the “average” adult. It turns out to be not so easy to figure. Do we count all forms of a word? Vermiculate, vermiculated, vermiculatable . . . ?

Books promising to build your vocabulary seldom give a good reason to do so. Will knowing more words make us richer? Prettier? Smarter? More popular? Better at board games?

I tried to determine the size of my own vocabulary. I took 3 online tests that claimed to have a representative set of questions and an algorithm for extrapolating to the total number of words I know. Results of the tests: 9600 words, 20,200 words, and 36, 800 words.

Two of the tests were multiple choice, one was simply a matter of checking yes or no as to whether I know the word. There’s not much hope of getting an accurate count, but it was fun trying. Have you tried lately?

Spring, you haven’t changed a bit

SCARY!

Every year, back Spring comes,

With the nasty little birds

yapping their fool heads off.

- – Dorothy Parker

In one house we lived in, we had a redwood deck out back. I didn’t go out there much, but when I did I found it disgusting. Multicolored droppings from birds lined the floor and the railings. What to do?

I went on line for products to keep birds away. There were dozens of products to *attract* birds, not one to get rid of them. Clerk after clerk in gardening shops looked at me as though I were a serial killer asking for sharp knives. Once in a while a salesperson would sympathize and advise a home remedy: smear mustard on the wood, mount a scary whirly gig. They spoke in whispers, lest they lose their jobs or be arrested as co-conspirator to murder. I didn’t want to kill the birds; I just wanted to discourage them from using my deck as a public restroom.

Anyone have an idea? (You’d better not use your real address.)

TELLING AUTHORS THE TRUTH

The Real Me loves guest bloggers! This week we have a special treat, with Lev Raphael.

Lev Raphael is the author of 24 books in genres from mystery to memoir to Jane Austen mash-up, as well as hundreds of essays, stories, reviews, and blogs. His books have been translated into a dozen languages and he’s done hundreds of invited talks and readings on three different continents. Lev is a former radio talk show host, has reviewed crime fiction for the Detroit Free Press, and he’s seen his shorter work appear in over two dozen anthologies. Recently he was invited to teach as a guest author at Michigan State University, whose Library’s Special Archives purchased his current and future literary papers. That means very soon he’ll be indexed!

~~~~

TELLING AUTHORS THE TRUTH by Lev Raphael

Back when my first book was about to come out in 1990, I remember my editor at St. Martin’s Press talking about it as if it were a box of cereal. Yes, we’d spent seven months editing the stories and arranging the collection, but discussing the price seemed to activate a different part of his brain.

This was helpful for me, because it taught me early on an important lesson: writing is a business, like it or not, and a book is a product that needs to be sold. I spent thousands of my own money those first two years taking myself on tour around the country and it paid off with reviews, name recognition, and sales.

But I didn’t just spend money. I took lots of time studying the book I was reading from, and practicing each and every reading. My partner came with me for many events and gave me director’s notes to help me hone my readings, since we both felt they were performances and the audience deserved the best I could give them. When beginning authors over the years have asked me about touring, I always tell them the truth as I see it: it’s exhilarating, but it takes a lot of work beforehand, and it helps being an extrovert. You have to engage with your audience and make the event lively and memorable.

Likewise, if young writers ask about graduate writing programs, I tell them the truth: they’re hit or miss.  Some students find  them helpful, others don’t. Mine was great because I saw it as a giant writers’ group, and as a way to keep writing under deadline. That turned out to be a useful skill years later when I started reviewing for The Detroit Free Press and other newspapers and magazines. It’s worth considering the time and expense of a program, and getting as many reports from graduates as you can, especially since the rap on programs is pretty bad right now.

Recently an author asked me what marketing or promotion techniques worked. I laughed and told him that I’ve tried everything: advertising on-line, in magazines, conference program books; going to conferences; even sending out many hundreds of postcards when those were all the rage. My results in general have been mixed. Well what about a blog tour, he asked? Isn’t that the hot new thing? Actually it isn’t. What I’m hearing from New York is that publicists are now pushing authors to advertise on Facebook. We’ll see how that works.

But as for blog tours, my own experience with one was dispiriting. I paid someone to organize it for me, and though she was excited by the response–14 bloggers took me on–the results were nil in terms of sales. When I blogged about it for The Huffington Post after a few months’ reflection, I was lambasted on-line as “nasty,” “whining,” and someone driving people away from blogs. Wow. Who knew I had that much power?

It’s unfortunate that so many people could completely misread what I wrote and that the simple truth could send them into rants. Nonetheless, I think it’s crucial that we authors share our experiences with all forms of promotion as honestly as possible with our peers, so that we help them pick and choose what might work for them. Unlike what I’ve heard from outraged bloggers or blogger-lovers and people who felt they needed defending, the response from authors and publishers to my HP blog has been very positive, and that means I’ve done my job well.

~~~~

Check out Lev’s collection of essays — practical and honest insights into the writing life.